Water Quality Report
2008
Water Quality Department
1 Kennedy Plaza
Phone:
(315)
792-0338
Dear Customer:
The Upper Mohawk Valley
Regional Water Board is pleased to present our water quality report to you.
Today, there is a heightened public awareness concerning our natural
resources and environment. The
quality of drinking water is understandably a primary interest.
This report includes
information on the tests we perform on our water both to comply with State
and Federal regulations and to test for some compounds which are not
regulated.
Also addressed are some
of the most commonly asked questions by our customers.
We have also included information on bottled water, lead and copper,
Cryptosporidium, and other topics.
The Upper Mohawk Valley
Regional Water Board is committed to meet all standards and to produce a
high quality water for you.
Since the opening of our 18 million dollar state-of-the-art
water treatment plant in December of
1992, the quality of the water has vastly improved.
We are proud to report that during 2008, the water provided
by the
The Regional Water
Board is confident that we will continue to produce high quality water for
you at reasonable costs.
We are especially anxious to hear your comments concerning this report.
Please forward your comments to:
Connie K. Schreppel Ph.D.
Water Quality
Laboratory
1
SOURCE
Pure
North of the Mohawk and
It is in the heart of this
sanctuary that the Mohawk Valley Water Authority system is found.
The water we drink gathers in the streams and creeks of a remote
CHLORINATION AND THMs
Most public water systems have been chlorinated since the turn of the century, when it was recognized that water-borne diseases could be eliminated, or at least greatly reduced, by disinfection. Ironically, while chlorination protects us from bacterial disease, it caused a problem of another nature.
Our
REMEDY -
FILTRATION
HOW IT
WORKS
The filtering process alone removes 99.9% of bacteria from the water. Therefore, less chlorine is needed to treat the filtered water. Also, due to the elimination of most of the organic matter in our water there is less taste, color and odor.
RESULT -
QUALITY
Mohawk Valley Water
Authority System customers can be assured that their drinking water is of
the highest quality. The system
is state-of-the-art and our water can rival the quality of any bottled
water. With the water
treatment and filtration plant, we have been able to actually improve on
nature, by taking fresh
FACILITY FACTS
Rapid mix - in-line
static mixer
Contact basins - 2
basins - 50' x 150'
Absorption clarifiers -
4 clarifiers - 626 sq. ft. each
Filters - 4 filters -
1248 sq. ft. each
Backwash tanks -
769,000 gallons
Clearwell - 1 tank -
1.5 million gallons
Waste disposal - 3
lagoons, 6.2 acres
CHEMICAL FEED
Soda ash
Alum
Polymers
Chlorine
Lime
Fluoride
SITE SIZE
62.6 acres total
In any given year, our crews respond to an average of 300 leaks. The MVWA’s repair crew is on call 24-hours a day to respond to leaks and other emergencies.
During normal working hours, crews are involved in preventative maintenance programs on valves and hydrants to insure that the system operates efficiently.
WATER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE
AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY
System Improvements
During 2008 the Mohawk
Valley Water Authority continued its aggressive program of reinvestment in
the Regional System. Total
capital expenditures were 9 million. Since 1998 over $ 35 million has been
expended on capital improvements to ensure reliable, quality water service.
On-going Projects in 2008 included:
Regulatory Compliance Plan - Water Treatment
Plant (WTP) Clearwell and
The WTP Clearwell was
completed and brought on line in Summer of 2008.
The 10 million gallon Deerfield Tank is in the final testing phase.
These projects are required by new EPA/DOH water quality regulations.
The new WTP Clearwell will improve disinfection efficiency at higher
flow rates and the Deerfield Tank will allow the existing uncovered
reservoir to be placed on stand-by service.
Regulatory Compliance Plan – Marcy Reservoir
and
The final design of the
Marcy Reservoir and bidding of these three projects was commenced in 2007.
Marcy Reservoir Tank was bid in March 2009 and construction will
commence in summer 2009. The
Toby Road Tanks are in final design and will be bid in Summer 2009. These
tanks are also required by new EPA/DOH water quality regulations and will
permit the existing open Marcy Reservoir to be removed from active service.
Hydraulic Modeling- $425,000
A hydraulic model of
the entire Regional System was completed and calibrated in 2008.
The model will be used to evaluate system deficiencies, identify
capital improvements and for emergency response planning.
Leak Detection Program Phase 5- $25,000
This phase of the leak
detection program was undertaken in February 2008 and is nearly complete
with over 100 leaks identified.
Repairs are completed by MVWA forces.
Identifying and repairing leaks reduces unaccounted for water,
reduces the number of main breaks and improves system pressures. This phase
begins the second time the Regional System will be entirely checked for
leaks.
Water Main Replacement & Extensions in
Whitestown,
Over 2100 feet of new
8” & 12” water main was installed by MVWA’s own forces to eliminate dead end
mains in several locations.
These areas included
GAC Full Scale Pilot Study- $ 280,000
This full scale filter
study was undertaken to determine if GAC was an effective filter media for
removing organic carbon from the raw water during the treatment process.
More effective removal of organic carbon will further reduce the formation
of disinfection by-products following chlorination of the drinking water.
WATER
QUALITY DEPARTMENT
The Water Quality Department
is responsible for monitoring and ensuring that the water produced and
delivered by the Mohawk Valley Water Authority meets or exceeds the water
quality standards set by
The department operates the in-house laboratory, obtains outside analytical services, sets standards for water treatment operations and conducts research projects. The research projects are used to solve problems and to prepare to meet future regulatory requirements. As new requirements are put into effect, the Mohawk Valley Water Authority will have to alter its treatment process to meet these standards. Our research activities will allow us to determine which treatment processes are the most effective for achieving the highest quality water in a cost effective manner and make sure that we are ready to meet new standards as they are proposed and implemented.
In 1996, the Water Quality
Laboratory expanded its capabilities to include a state-of-the-art
microbiological testing facility.
This effort has continued through 2008.
We are active participants in national and international research
projects concerning the detection and identification of waterborne parasites
and pathogens such as Giardia and Cryptosporidium.
Laboratory equipment includes sophisticated microscopes equipped with
sophisticated computerized programs for imaging and archiving. The facility
is second to none in
In October 1999, the MVWA received a USEPA grant to begin the study and implementation of a comprehensive source water protection program and watershed management plan. The final report was filed with the EPA in 2000 however this project has become incorporated into an ongoing effort to help protect our source water that is the heart of our community and our way of life.
The Water Quality Department is also an active member of the American Water Works Research Foundation (AWWARF). During 2008, the Water Quality Department staff presented research papers concerning water quality and the MVWA’s operations. During 2009, we hope to continue these efforts and make a difference in the water quality field.
WATER QUALITY REGULATIONS
In 1974, Congress passed the Safe Drinking Water Act, which set federal standards for drinking water. At that time, 22 contaminants were regulated. In 1986, the Act was amended to regulate many more contaminants and to further reduce acceptable levels of some contaminants. Currently more than 80 contaminants are regulated in potable water. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) has begun to regulate additional contaminates during 2001. These federal standards are then adopted (and occasionally made more stringent) by the New York State Sanitary Code.
The Water Quality Laboratory ensures compliance with the federal and state regulations in part by continuous in-house sampling and testing. Samples are taken around the clock every day by the Water Treatment Plant Operators. These samples are used to test for total coliform bacteria, pH, turbidity, chlorine residuals, fluoride concentration, alkalinity, hardness, and chloride.
The majority of the regulated contaminants are tested less frequently on a schedule set down in state and federal regulations. These include inorganics (metals and non-metals), organics (chemical solvents, pesticides, herbicides, hydrocarbons) and radioactive compounds. For most of these substances, testing shows no detectable amounts present in our water.
In July of 1997, a new EPA testing regulation began. This regulation, called the Information Collection Rule (ICR), remained in effect until December of 1998. The MVWA was required to monitor many new chemical parameters as well as protozoan pathogens under this rule. Also during this time period, treatment plant data and distribution system samples and data were compiled. The results of this testing was made available in 1999 by the EPA in the form of a national database available on the Internet.
The Long Term 2 Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule (LT2) and the Stage 2 Disinfection/Disinfection Bi-Products (Stage 2 DBP) Rule were enacted by EPA in January 2006. The LT2 rule requires most systems to monitor their raw source water for Cryptosporidium for a period of 2 years and then provide additional treatment of the water if levels are greater than threshold limits established by the rule. The LT2 Rule also requires all systems with uncovered finished water reservoirs (UFWR) to remove those reservoirs from service, cover them, or treat the effluent leaving the UFWR.
The Stage 2 DBP Rule requires large water suppliers to systematically identify areas in the distribution system with the worst potential for disinfection by product formation and to select new monitoring sites from this process. Further, this rule requires each new site’s running annual average to be in compliance with federal limits of 0.080ppm for Total Trihalomethanes (TTHM) and 0.060ppm for Haloacetic Acids (HAAs). Prior to this rule all monitoring sites were averaged to achieve an overall distribution average for regulatory compliance.
The results of the testing
required by the Safe Drinking Water Act are submitted regularly to the
WE FIND IN THE DRINKING WATER?
Drinking water contains many different chemical compounds, many of which occur in nature. Some of these, such as minerals, impart a flavor to the water and prevent it from tasting bland. Other chemicals, such as heavy metals or pesticides, are contaminants that can affect health if ingested and must be removed or reduced to acceptable levels set by the US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) and the New York State Health Department. Most of these contaminants do not appear in nature. We test for many groups of compounds. These include: Volatile Organic Chemicals, Synthetic Organic Chemicals, Inorganic chemicals including metals and non-metals, Pesticides, Radio nuclides, Trihalomethanes, and some unregulated compounds.
Many of the compounds that we test for have maximum contaminate levels (MCLs), which are established by state and federal regulation. The maximum level for these compounds is based on health related information. The presence of these compounds at levels exceeding the maximum allowable level requires immediate public notification to our customers and state officials. The USEPA has not yet set standards for some unregulated compounds. Additional information about any compound on the following list can be obtained from the Water Quality Department.
The 2008 results of testing for the compounds are listed in the following tables. The frequency and amount of testing is mandated by the NYS Health Department and all results are reported to that agency. Parameters such as pH, turbidity, fluoride, and bacterial tests are monitored several times per day.
The allowable concentration is the maximum contaminate level or MCL. The MCL is generally in units of milligrams per liter (mg/L) or micrograms per liter (µg/L), but other units are used for some parameters. These are listed in the table. Other information is listed in the table.
Also listed in these tables is a summary of the Bacterial Analysis that is performed daily by the Water Quality Laboratory. Testing is done throughout the entire distribution system to monitor for disinfectant residuals and bacterial content. Several types of bacterial tests are performed. These include: the test for Total Coliform Bacteria, and the test for Escherichia coli.
Testing in 2008 has revealed
less than one coliform per 100 ml in all of our monthly monitoring averages.
The water that our customers receive is of a superior bacteriological
quality.
TABLE 1.
EPA 525.2
SEMI-VOLATILE SOC’s (sample taken 9/19/08)
SOC COMPOUNDS
|
ALLOWABLE CONC (mg/L)
|
RESULT
(mg/L)
|
|
Alachlor(1016,1221,1232,1242,1248,1254,1260) |
0.002 |
< 0.0001 |
|
Aldrin |
NL |
< 0.001 |
|
Atrazine |
0.003 |
< 0.0006 |
|
Benzo(a)pyrene |
0.0002 |
< 0.0002 |
|
gamma-BHC (Lindane) |
0.0002 |
< 0.0001 |
|
Butachlor |
NL |
< 0.01 |
|
alpha-Chlordane |
0.002 |
< 0.0004 |
|
gamma-Chlordane |
0.002 |
< 0.001 |
|
Dieldrin |
NL |
< 0.001 |
|
Endrin |
0.002 |
< 0.001 |
|
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)adipate |
0.4 |
< 0.01 |
|
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate |
0.006 |
0.0045 |
|
Heptachlor |
0.0004 |
< 0.0001 |
|
Heptachlor epoxide |
0.0002 |
< 0.0001 |
|
Hexachlorobenzene |
0.001 |
< 0.0002 |
|
Methoxychlor |
0.04 |
< 0.008 |
|
Metolachlor |
NL
|
< 0.01 |
|
Metribuzin |
NL |
< 0.01 |
|
Simazine |
0.004 |
< 0.0008 |
< - Less than
NL – No Limit
µg/L – Micrograms/per liter
Mg/L – Milligrams/per liter
TABLE 2.
EPA 200.8 TOTAL
METALS BY ICP/MS
TOTAL METALS
|
ALLOWABLE CONC
(mg/L)
|
RESULTS
(mg/L)
|
|
Antimony |
0.006 |
<
0.001 |
|
Arsenic |
0.05 |
<
0.001 |
|
Barium |
2.00 |
0.0085 |
|
Beryllium |
0.004 |
<
0.001 |
|
Cadmium |
0.005 |
<
0.001 |
|
Chromium |
0.10 |
<0.001 |
|
Mercury |
0.002 |
<
0.001 |
|
Nickel |
0.006 |
<
0.001 |
|
Thallium |
0.002 |
<
0.001 |
|
Copper |
1.3 |
0.027 |
|
Selenium |
0.05 |
<0.001 |
TOTAL CYANIDE
|
ALLOWABLE CONC
(mg/L)
|
RESULTS
(mg/L)
|
|
Cyanide |
0.2 |
<
0.01 |
TABLE 4.
EPA 524.2 POC’S
VINYL CHLORIDE & MTBE
POC’s
|
ALLOWABLE CONC (µg/L)
|
RESULT
(µg/L)
|
|
Benzene |
5.0 |
< 0.5 |
|
Bromobenzene |
5.0 |
< 0.5 |
|
Bromochloromethane |
5.0 |
< 0.5 |
|
Bromomethane |
5.0 |
< 0.5 |
|
sec-Butylbenzene |
5.0 |
< 0.5 |
|
n-Butylbenzene |
5.0 |
< 0.5 |
|
tert-Butylbenzene |
5.0 |
< 0.5 |
TABLE 4.
EPA 524.2 POC’S
VINYL CHLORIDE & MTBE - (Continued)
POC’s
|
ALLOWABLE CONC (µg/L)
|
RESULT
(µg/L)
|
|
Carbon tetrachloride |
5.0 |
< 0.5 |
|
Chlorobenzene |
5.0 |
< 0.5 |
|
Chloroethane |
5.0 |
< 0.5 |
|
Chloromethane |
5.0 |
< 0.5 |
|
2-Chlorotoluene |
5.0 |
< 0.5 |
|
4-Chlorotoluene |
5.0 |
< 0.5 |
|
Dibromomethane |
5.0 |
< 0.5 |
|
1,
2-Dichlorobenzene |
5.0 |
< 0.5 |
|
1,
3-Dichlorobenzene |
5.0 |
< 0.5 |
|
1,
4-Dichlorobenzene |
5.0 |
< 0.5 |
|
Dichlorodifluoromethane |
5.0 |
< 0.5 |
|
1,
1-Dichloroethane |
5.0 |
< 0.5 |
|
1,
2-Dichloroethane |
5.0 |
< 0.5 |
|
cis-1, 2-Dichloroethane |
5.0 |
< 0.5 |
|
1,
1-Dichloroethane |
5.0 |
< 0.5 |
|
Trans-1, 2-Dichloroethane |
5.0 |
< 0.5 |
|
1,
2-Dichloropropane |
5.0 |
< 0.5 |
|
1,
3-Dichloropropane |
5.0 |
< 0.5 |
|
2,
2-Dichloropropane |
5.0 |
< 0.5 |
|
1,
1-Dichloropropane |
5.0 |
< 0.5 |
|
cis-1, 3-Dichloropropane |
5.0 |
< 0.5 |
|
Trans-1, 3-Dichloropropane |
5.0 |
< 0.5 |
|
Ethyl
benzene |
5.0 |
< 0.5 |
|
Hexachlorobutadiene |
5.0 |
< 0.5 |
|
Isopropylbenzene (Cumene) |
5.0 |
< 0.5 |
POC’s
|
ALLOWABLE CONC (µg/L)
|
RESULT
(µg/L)
|
|
4-Isopropyl toluene (Cymene) |
5.0 |
< 0.5 |
|
Methylene chloride |
5.0 |
< 0.5 |
|
N-Propylbenzene |
5.0 |
< 0.5 |
|
Styrene |
5.0 |
< 0.5 |
|
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane |
5.0 |
< 0.5 |
|
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane |
5.0 |
< 0.5 |
|
Tetrachloroethane |
5.0 |
< 0.5 |
|
Toluene |
5.0 |
< 0.5 |
|
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene |
5.0 |
< 0.5 |
|
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene |
5.0 |
< 0.5 |
|
1,1,1-Trichloroethane |
5.0 |
< 0.5 |
|
1,1,2-Trichloroethane |
5.0 |
< 0.5 |
|
Trichloroethene |
5.0 |
< 0.5 |
|
Trichlorofluoromethane (Freon 11) |
5.0 |
< 0.5 |
|
1,2,3-Trichloropropane |
5.0 |
< 0.5 |
|
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene |
5.0 |
< 0.5 |
|
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene |
5.0 |
< 0.5 |
|
o-Xylene |
5.0 |
< 0.5 |
|
m-Xylene |
5.0 |
< 0.5 |
|
p-Xylene |
5.0 |
< 0.5 |
|
MTBE |
5.0 |
< 0.5 |
ANNUAL
AVERAGES (±
s.d.) FOR YEAR 2008
(Raw Water vs. Finished Drinking Water)
|
PARAMETER |
UNIT OF MEASURE |
ALLOWABLE CONC |
(Raw Water) |
MARCY OUTFLOW*
(Finished) |
|
TEMPERATURE |
DEGREES CENTRIGRADE |
NL |
10 + 7 |
11+ 7 |
|
ALKALINITY |
mg/L AS CALCIUM CARB |
NL |
15 + 5 |
45 + 6 |
|
TOTAL HARDNESS |
mg/L AS CALCIUM CARB |
NL |
16 + 3 |
20 + 5 |
|
CALCIUM HARDNESS |
mg/L AS CALCIUM CARB |
NL |
13 + 4 |
17 + 5 |
|
MAGNESIUM HARDNESS |
mg/L AS CALCIUM CARB |
NL |
4 + 2 |
4 + 2 |
|
CHLORIDES |
mg/L |
250 |
6.2 + 2.4 |
7.8 + 1.1 |
|
TURBIDITY |
NTU |
5.0 |
1.29 + 0.41 |
0.45 + 0.15 |
|
pH |
pH UNITS |
NL |
6.68 + 0.27 |
9.14 + 0.23 |
|
COLOR |
COLOR UNITS |
15 |
37 + 7 |
13 + 6 |
|
IRON |
mg/L |
0.3 |
0.20 + 0.14 |
0.04 + 0.03 |
|
CONDUCTIVITY |
µMHO/cm |
NL |
46 + 25 |
138 + 14 |
|
TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS |
mg/L |
NL |
22 + 12 |
65 + 7 |
|
FLUORIDE |
-- |
-- |
NA |
1.02 + 0.13 |
*Distribution water
|
PARAMETER |
UNIT OF MEASURE |
ALLOWABLE CONCENTRATION |
RESULT AVERAGE |
|
|
NITRATE |
mg/L |
10 |
<0.25 |
|
|
PARAMETER |
UNIT OF MEASURE |
ALLOWABLE CONC |
(Raw Water) |
FILTRATION PLANT
(Finished) |
|
TOC |
mg/L |
NL |
5.29 |
1.87 |
|
UV254 |
Abs cm-1 |
NL |
0.179
|
0.033
|
|
|
|
NL |
3.39 |
1.80 |
|
% TOC Removal |
|
NL |
- |
64.3% |
< - Less than
Mg/L – Milligrams/per liter
s.d.- Standard deviation
ANNUAL TABLE 6.
MICROBIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS
DISTRIBUTION
SYSTEM 2006
|
PARAMETER |
UNIT
OF MEASURE |
ALLOWABLE CONCENTRATION |
RESULT
AVERAGE |
|
TOTAL
COLIFORM BACTERIA |
BACTERIA PER 100 mL |
< 5% |
% |
|
E.
coli |
BACTERIA PER 100 mL |
< 1
PER 100 mL |
< 1
PER 100 mL |
(a) - TOTAL
TRIHALOMETHANE LEVELS - TTHM
|
Year 2006 |
AVERAGE
TTHM
(µg/L) |
|
4-QUARTER
AVERAGE TTHM |
63 |
|
|
Range of:
19-124 |
|
ALLOWABLE
AVERAGE LIMIT (MCL) |
80 |
|
Year 2006 |
AVERAGE
HAA
(mg/L) |
|
4 QUARTER
AVERAGE HAA |
24 |
|
|
Range of:
11-49 |
|
ALLOWABLE
AVERAGE LIMIT (MCL) |
60 |
|
SITE NO. |
LEAD
RESULTS
(ppb) |
SITE NO. |
LEAD
RESULTS
(ppb) |
|
1 |
<1.0 |
27 |
4.7 |
|
2 |
<1.0 |
28 |
5.0 |
|
3 |
<1.0 |
29 |
5.0 |
|
4 |
<1.0 |
30 |
5.0 |
|
5 |
<1.0 |
31 |
5.4 |
|
6 |
<1.0 |
32 |
5.5 |
|
7 |
<1.0 |
33 |
5.7 |
|
8 |
<1.0 |
34 |
5.8 |
|
9 |
<1.0 |
35 |
6.2 |
|
10 |
<1.0 |
36 |
6.4 |
|
11 |
<1.0 |
37 |
6.5 |
|
12 |
1.6 |
38 |
7.1 |
|
13 |
1.7 |
39 |
7.4 |
|
14 |
2.2 |
40 |
7.7 |
|
15 |
2.3 |
41 |
7.7 |
|
16 |
2.6 |
42 |
8.4 |
|
17 |
2.6 |
43 |
8.5 |
|
18 |
3.4 |
44 |
8.7 |
|
19 |
3.8 |
45 |
9.0 |
|
20 |
3.8 |
46 |
9.1 |
|
21 |
3.9 |
47 |
9.3 |
|
22 |
4.2 |
48 |
11.0 |
|
23 |
4.3 |
49 |
11.0 |
|
24 |
4.3 |
50 |
11.0 |
|
25 |
4.4 |
51 |
11.0 |
|
26 |
4.7 |
52 |
15.0 |
|
|
|
53 |
21.0 |
|
|
|
54 |
23.0 |
N0TE:
1)
90.0th percentile is # 49 0.011 mg/l or 11
ppb lead.
Federal regulations require the 90th percentile lead level
to be 15 ppb or lower.
Next required monitoring
2009
RADIOLOGICAL
ANALYSIS*
|
|
LEVEL
ALLOWED |
RESULT |
|
GROSS
ALPHA |
15 PcI/L
|
1.16
|
|
RADIUM
-226 |
|
0.204
|
|
RADIUM
-228 |
|
0.176 |
|
Combined
RADIUM |
5 pCi/L |
0.380 |
Cryptosporidium
is a disease caused by the parasite Cryptosporidium parvum, which as
late as 1976 was not known to cause disease in humans.
Until 1993, when over 400,000 people in
Since the
Under the new Safe Drinking Water Act that has not been finalized, the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency will require all public water systems over
10,000 people to start looking for Cryptosporidium in the sources of
their drinking water. Those
systems that find the parasite will also have to test their finished water -
the water that comes out of the tap for Cryptosporidium.
The best means of
controlling the parasite is through a multi-barrier defense of filtration
and chlorination. Both of these
processes are performed and monitored at the Water Treatment
Plant located in Prospect,
Information on
Cryptosporidium and Testing Results for 2008
CRYPTOSPORIDIOSIS:
FACT SHEET
FROM:
New York State Health Department
Cryptosporidium
infection can be caused by swallowing only a small amount of
Cryptosporidium oocysts.
Some sources of infection are:
Stool
Food
Vegetables and fruit
that touch dirt might be contaminated.
Washing vegetables and fruit that will not be cooked, with water that
has been boiled or filtered to remove Cryptosporidium, or bottled
water that does not contain Cryptosporidium, can make them safer.
Fruit that will not be cooked can also be peeled to make them safer.
Fruit that will not be cooked can also be peeled to make it safer.
Cooked and packaged foods are probably safe if they are not handled
by an infected person after cooking or processing.
Unpasteurized milk or dairy products may not be safe.
Dirt in the garden and other places can become contaminated when an animal with Crypto leaves its stool there. Any object, such as a faucet handle, diaper changing table or bed pan, that is touched by an infected person who did not wash well after using the toilet can be contaminated. Individuals should always wash their hands well after working in dirt or touching anything that could have been contaminated by a person with Crypto.
There is no known drug
that can cure Cryptosporidiosis.
Healthy individuals will recover on their own. Persons with diarrhea
should drink plenty of fluids and may want to drink an oral rehydration
therapy mix, to avoid dehydration.
These mixes are available at drug stores and sports stores.
They may also wish to take anti-diarrhea medicine.
Persons with weakened immune systems should consult their health care
provider if they think they have Cryptosporidium.
If someone is infected with Cryptosporidium, they should wash their hands regularly, especially before preparing food and after going to the toilet; avoid close contact with anyone who may have a weakened immune system; and avoid swimming in public bathing areas (swimming pools, water parks, etc.) while they have diarrhea and for at least two weeks after it clears up.
THE LEAD AND COPPER RULE
During 1992, the Water Board conducted two rounds of testing for lead and copper to comply with this new rule. Samples were taken from high-risk households throughout our service area. One hundred homeowners with lead in their household plumbing volunteered for this program. The homeowner was required to leave the water standing in their household plumbing for eight hours and then a water sample was taken. Over 200 samples were collected and analyzed. The Federal Lead and Copper Rule states that lead levels in the high-risk homes must be below 0.015 ppm (15 ppb) in 90% of the homes tested. Results of these tests in 1992 showed that the lead level in our drinking water was above the maximum allowable level. However, this first round of testing had to be completed before the new treatment plant was fully operational. Corrosion control chemical feeders were installed in the new Prospect plant and corrosion has been greatly reduced and lead levels have dropped dramatically in these high-risk homes. Lead levels during the first half of 1995 reached a low of 0.010 ppm at the 90th percentile and continued at these levels through 1996. In 1997, the New York State Health Department, being satisfied with the lead testing results, reduced the monitoring requirement for lead to fifty samples per year. These samples were taken during the warm weather months, June - September 1997, when lead could pose a problem in household plumbing. The lead level at the 90th percentile during this period of 1997 was 0.014 ppm. This was well within the federal guidelines.
In addition, during 1993
research activities examined ways to further reduce pipe corrosion in our system
and improve the filtration process.
These studies indicated that additional corrosion control facilities were
needed. Construction of this
corrosion control facility was started in the summer of 1995 and completed in
early 1996. The effective use of
this corrosion control facility has drastically reduced the lead levels at the
high-risk consumers tap to levels acceptable to the State and Federal
government. The New York
State Health Department is satisfied that the Mohawk Valley Water Authority has
achieved optimum corrosion control and compliance lead level monitoring has been
reduced to a three-year schedule.
Required lead monitoring tests were collected in 2006. Testing results indicate
that the lead levels are within federal guidelines.
The results are listed in the chemical analysis section. The next round
of testing will occur in 2009. If you are concerned about lead levels at your
tap in your home, you can have your water tested at a
BOTTLED WATER AND HOME TREATMENT SYSTEMS AS
AN ALTERNATIVE FOR DRINKING WATER
The bottled water and home
treatment system industries experienced a phenomenal growth in the
Consumers want high quality
water and often feel that bottled water or additional in-home purification will
provide higher quality water than that directly from the tap.
This is generally not true.
In
Home water treatment devices
should only be used when an obvious water quality problem is demonstrated.
Water quality testing to determine the existence of a problem in your
home should be performed in a
WHEN CONSIDERING A HOME WATER TREATMENT DEVICE
1.
No one device can
correct all water quality problem.
Each type of device has a specific function.
There is no such thing as a one-device-cures-all treatment.
For example: carbon filters can remove some organic chemical
contaminants, but are not effective against inorganic chemical contaminants,
(nitrate or heavy metals or microorganisms).
2.
All
home water treatment devices require continuous maintenance for proper
operation. Failure to properly
maintain these devices can result in poorer water quality.
Public water suppliers like the
Mohawk Valley Water Authority and across the
THE COST OF BOTTLED WATER VS. REGIONAL WATER
BOARD WATER
One gallon of bottled water is
approximately $
1.50
One gallon of MVWA’s water
costs approximately $ 0.003
We are pleased to present our water quality report to you. Delivering high quality water to you is the highest priority for the Mohawk Valley Water Authority. Through the meticulous efforts of the Regional Water Board team, the water is now meeting or exceeding federal and state water quality standards.
Sincerely yours,
Connie K. Schreppel Ph.D.
Laboratory Director
Water Quality Laboratory